Australia Is Now Considered A Sovereign Risk
By Collin Maessen on commentIn this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that “Australia is now regarded as a sovereign risk”. What does this mean and was this an accurate depiction?
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that “Australia is now regarded as a sovereign risk”. What does this mean and was this an accurate depiction?
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that based on current trends the increase in global temperatures cannot accelerate.
In this section I talk about examples of what it costs to implement a carbon pricing system and what the economic literature says on these costs.
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that jobs will be lost. However real world examples, and studies, show that those jobs are easily replaced by new jobs in the renewable energy industry.
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the point that Australia alone cannot significantly impact global CO2 concentrations to make a difference. Which is true, the problem is, Australia isn’t the only country reducing its emissions.
In this video I explain to which chart Monckton is referring with this “flagrantly fraudulent statistical technique” and what the report actually states.
Here I explain the difference between the stated warming of the IPCC report and the number used by the Australian Government.
With this video I went into the details of what was said in the report and the events surrounding the approval of the wording.
In this video I looked into these claims and what the IPCC report says, the science behind it, and the events surrounding these claims.
In this video I address this view on how consensus works in climate research and how consensus works in other science subjects.