Teaser – A Historic Series Of Interviews At The AGU 2014 Fall Meeting
By Collin Maessen on commentTeaser for the interviews held at the AGU 2014 Fall Meeting
Teaser for the interviews held at the AGU 2014 Fall Meeting
One of the latest papers studying the scientific consensus on global warming was Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming by Bart Verheggen. In this interview Verheggen talks about the results they found and their meaning.
The claim that global warming has stopped is popping up more and more in the media. Unfortunately this ignores how temperatures respond on a warming world and ignores a vast array of evidence that shows that it hasn’t stopped.
A little update as I’ve been silent for a long time.
In this section I give my impression of the debate, how it was received, and how factually correct Monckton was.
In this section Monckton claims that CO2 acts as a fertiliser and will increase food production significantly. I’ll be looking into the basis for this claims and if this is supported by the scientific literature.
In this section Monckton talks about feedback loops and how they show that climate sensitivity is low. I show how these concepts are used and what this means for the argument Monckton is presenting.
Here Monckton makes the claim that he is a Member of the House of Lords, despite the House of Lords stating that he isn’t. I’ll be looking into the history of this claim and why Monckton has a different opinion on the matter.
In this section Monckton asserts that he can cite paper after paper showing that he’s correct that there’s a low climate sensitivity. And that there is no consensus on this subject.
During this part of the debate Monckton suggests that countries are dropping out of the Kyoto protocol as they don’t see the merit in taking action on a non-issue. But is this the case?