Calculating Climate Sensitivity
By Collin Maessen on commentMonckton introduces the argument that the Central England temperature record can be used as a proxy for global temperatures. But can it be used for that?
Monckton introduces the argument that the Central England temperature record can be used as a proxy for global temperatures. But can it be used for that?
During this part of the debate the issue of civility in the public arena during discussions on climate change is raised. I give my take on the matter and on civility in general.
In this part of the debate Monckton asserts that the stated goals of the Australian Green party match those stated in the Communist Manifesto and by European communist parties.
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that Greenpeace has been taken over by Marxists. I’ll be looking into what is used to base this claim on and if this is a fair assessment.
Here Monckton makes the claim that GM crops have been in use for a long time and are safe for human consumption. But does what Monckton say match up with with reality?
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that he has studied and lectured at faculty level in the determination of climate sensitivity.
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that “Australia is now regarded as a sovereign risk”. What does this mean and was this an accurate depiction?
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that based on current trends the increase in global temperatures cannot accelerate.
In this section I talk about examples of what it costs to implement a carbon pricing system and what the economic literature says on these costs.
In this particular section of the debate Monckton makes the claim that jobs will be lost. However real world examples, and studies, show that those jobs are easily replaced by new jobs in the renewable energy industry.